Hbee Inc.

I’ve been trying to have a “conversation” with Larry Sinclair’s one or two adamant fans.

I think I’ve been doing an OK job of raising points just to watch them put them down. No real discussion.

I’ve proved my point.

Don’t know if I need to keep going or not.

Sorry, this quote by Victor takes the cake:

“As for Larry’s site becoming an Obama hate site – I think it is ridiculous to suppose that the allegations and the arguments must be made only by political eunuchs. Larry did not know who Obama was when he had sex and drugs with him in 1999 and did not care. Its 2008 now. Larry has grown up. Now he does know who Obama is and he does care.”

Telling, no?

I think he refuted Larry’s claims.

Concerned Citizens…

As I read your logical posts over there, I once again felt like hitting my head against a brick wall. You cannot use logic and reason to prove your point. As GWB said, “You’re either with us or against us.” You wanted him to give you one little piece of something to make you think that MAYBE this might in the best of lights have some truth to it. Here you go….Larry might have had a drug/sexual encounter with a Black man in Chicago? It’s a start. This is my conjecture. Of course, I wasn’t there so I can’t know anything much, and of course, only Attorney Sibley has the real information.

I’m unsettlingly interested in true crime books (St Martin’s Press). My sons say that if someone ever saw what I read they’d be at my doorstep if anyone got knocked off in my town. I think I’m in the wrong profession. I find the criminal mind fascinating, though FBI profiles less so….shot in the dark…IMHO. The joy of conman is to have people believe them and anyone who does not is A LIAR. (Lar…I didn’t know use your name here so I’m just making a general statement in case you’re thinking about a suing me.)

Go back and read some of the other posts. I found yesterday an interview Larry did in CA when he went for the lie detector. The guy writes that Larry told him that he met Obama for drinks and they talked (on his second night in Chicago) and then went off the the limo and did all those nasty things. http://mygaybor.com/_wsn/page3.html
I repeat the link for your information. If I remember the story I heard in the past, Senator Obama didn’t go in anywhere…was told to wait for the limo on the sidewalk…and just hopped in and the party started. Once again to repeat myself….the LARRY RESPONSE will be HE’S A LIAR. I NEVER TOLD HIM THAT..maybe he should sue. Again, Lar, this is a guess on my part. I don’t REALLY know what words you will say. Gotta protect myself here….I do come from a family of lawyers, though funnily enough, I’ve never sued anyone or actually been in court other than my eventually amicable divorce.

I think I want to make money off Larry Sinclair. I am going to start an evidence blog. Let Larry get angry that I got larrysinclair0926.blogspot.com and larrysinclair.wordpress.com. HAHAHAHAHA

PS Paul, its 007.

Let me know where that evidence blog is since I have a folder….no kidding. I was getting too many bookmarks so I printed off a few things, inconsistencies along the way.

Have you seen the latest about Donald Young? I can’t even begin to start to address that whole scenario. Later maybe….

Larry is increasingly surrounding himself with sycophants at his blog. He blocks people who raise too many uncomfortable questions (like about his supposed law degree and master’s degree).

Whoa. Earlier freelarrysinclair.wordpress.com was mimicking larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com, but now it seems that Larry’s blog is mimicking Hunter’s blog, and unintentionally at that. Victorino tried to soften Hunter’s rhetoric by denying Hunter and Larry are racists and now Victor tries to soften Larry’s rhetoric by denying Larry’s blog is an Obama hate site. Life imitates art.

I even saw some of Paul’s logic on Larry’s blog. While asking everyone who ever had sex or drugs with Obama to come forward, Larry wrote, “It is my sincere belief that you will, in fact, place yourselves at greater risk of harm by remaining silent.” Isn’t that what Paul (and everyone else) has been saying about the limo driver? He’s in more danger by remaining silent. Apparently, witnesses to debauchery or murder are safer hiding behind Larry’s skirts than going to the FBI with evidence.

This whole thing is an existential nightmare. It’s hard to tell who are the real Obamaniacs, larrytards, Bushies, Clintonistas and RonPaulians. Instead of wondering if Chuang Tzu is a man dreaming if he’s a butterfly, or a butterfly dreaming he’s Chuang Tzu, I wonder if Paul Day is pretending to be Billybobneck, or if Billybobneck is pretending to be Paul Day.

As for Idiocracy, I watched it on the recommendation of others who thought it was funny, and I wasn’t laughing at most of it. I found the movie downright depressing, because it’s not a satire of what our country will be become. It’s a satire of what it already is.

Right now we have Larry riding his monster truck of what he calls truth and I call innuendo and he’s trying to run it over Obama and all his “internet warriors.” Paul, we who are about to puke, salute you.

HaHa Googal,
I could almost smell little brain-cells burning up when Citizen was debating with Larr & old Vic, I could almost see the little heads bobbing and googling for a dictionary!

Must admit Larry’s site is also great for movie reviews too, such culture he draws from his supporters!

Yeh Googal,
The larrytards go in training at http://freelarrysinclair.wordpress.com/ and then they graduate to Larry’s site.
CRAZY WORLD!

Thank you, democratista, that was an interesting point.

I was always skeptical of his claims, like any healthy person would be, and trying to get to the bottom of it only resulting in me being labeled as “cultee” of Obama, and in the end Mr. Sinclair released information that I am a student of the University of Michigan by tracking my IP.

So, that being the final straw, I am done posting and debating. I wasn’t only trying to affirm of disprove the allegations and the lojik used by others, but also trying to raise some concerns and actually inject common sense into the debate.

I think that some of my best points went ignored, which I believe is telling. They responding to things I didn’t expect them to, and in ways I didn’t expect them to.

Good day, all.

Oh Oh Concerned Citizen looks like Victor is ready to spar again you “cultee you” and intelligent outlawales is there for you too, hot damn you’re in for a treat, get the marshmallows out – looks like more little brain-cells will be sizzling today!

Concerned Citizen…

Our discourse made it to Larry’s page courtesy of “Sister”. You are apparently (according to Larry cause I don’t know) posting over at BHDC under several different names and you are a law student and related to Axelrod. My allegation that the story was changed was (of course) not addressed.

Hey SISTAH…You want ask Larry why the gay news guy has a different story than he’s been telling? And it’s a nice ploy to ignore that and go on about us not using our names….deflect the attention…good work.

And Concerned Citizen, Larry also tracked my IP to Boston University, but I didn’t tell him what I was doing there or why. Could be my kid/boyfriend/girlfriend/neighbor’s computer, right?

Have a good day and a GREAT WEEKEND, but I’m sure we’ll talk.

OFF TO THE GYM….Gotta work off some of those aggressive tendencies…..

Yeah, I saw that.

I’m confused how he makes that assessment as well. I don’t recall ever claiming I was a law student. He doesn’t have any proof, just the ardent ears of those who take him for his words without question.

I tried talking, asking questions, and taking a high road to it. I have not insulted him, I have not misinformed anyone, and I haven’t spread lies about anyone.

You know what’s even more damning? I don’t even know what BHDC is. Is it some sort of congenital disease? It sounds like something my uncle had.

I am, of course, honest in my assertion that I am a full-time student at the University of Michigan. I am also honest in all of my other claims: I am an English and Communication Studies double-major. I have a full-tuition scholarship to U of M, called “The Scholar Recognition Award.”

I will not, however, give out personal information beyond that. I am not an idiot. Larry asked me what Quad I live in, or if I live off campus. That question in itself is loaded. He wouldn’t be able to make a trace to U of M without me using the University’s computers. Of course, I will not answer that as it is reaching too far.

Oh man. I’d love to see him try to connect me to any other bloggers, or prove that I am related to an “Axelrod.” Coincidentally, I have just recently replaced an “axelrod” on my girlfriends car that broke.

Like I said, though, I am not responding to those claims on his blog because:

1) It’s debasing to myself.
2) They are well-constructed lies and conspiracy theories.
3) I feel as if they are setting me up. It’s almost like I’m being lulled into a trap. Perhaps he wants me to slip up and say something on his blog?

Look, nowhere have I ever said anything untrue or unsubstantiated about Mr. Sinclair that he himself had not posted or said. I do not post on this “BHDC”…uh….forum. I truly am a concerned citizen who is trying to get at the bottom of this.

Yes, I do plan on having a great weekend. I spend so much time at U of M that I rarely get to see my girlfriend or my family (my grandma’s birthday is Monday, but I have to go back to school so I’m celebrating Sunday). I hope you have a GREAT WEEKEND as well.

Yes sisterrosenut is a SNITCH I tell you a SNITCH that little troll

HaHa Concerned Citizen your uncle’s congenital was far worse I’m afraid if it was BHD it’s Big Head DC site – Larry’s adopted family.

Jesus. Now apparently I don’t do my own independent research and I’m an Obama zombie.

Did you also see where someone accused me of being Obama’s lawyer?

For God’s sake. I’m a 20 year old college student who follows the news. I don’t read conspiracy theory blogs, and I definitely don’t read from blogs that comment on the news, not report it.

Oh well. I guess it just proves how insane this all is. I’m glad I was able to get to the bottom of it. Just by reading their attacks on me, Larry’s posts, and the logic and thinking employed by those who support him, I can understand the character of those at his blog.

I wonder if they even understand how their much hated “MSM” even works. Being a student of Communication Studies, I know that most editor’s desks of any major newspaper get inundated with over 7,000 pieces of news a day.

Drawing from my experience as an editor of my High School’s newspaper, and work with The Michigan Daily, I know you have to be selective with the news stories that you print, and based on my experience with local news stations and WolvTV, I know that broadcast news has to be even more selective.

I will state simply that the reason these allegations have not been reported is because they lack merit. Newspapers and news broadcasts (including the much despised “MSM”) will not put their reputations on the line to report something without evidence.

The New York Times has always been an anomaly. I don’t take that paper very seriously anymore. They are pretty much flying off of the reputation that they gained from editors of old.

The logic employed on Larry’s blog by many of his supporters reminds me of some idiots I used to argue with last year when I lived in Mary Markley (it’s mainly a freshman dorm, located on the Medical Campus just south of U of M’s hospital). They use false dichotomies and false dilemmas to make their arguments. You are presented with A or B, and it couldn’t possibly be C,D,E, or so on because of their interpretation. They present these types of arguments all of the time.

For example: If the MSM doesn’t report on this then they love Barack Obama.

This is grade A bullshit. If anything the media are the most skeptical of the situation. I know this, being involved in many aspects of the media.

What’s defeats these arguments even more is the fact that if the media gave this story any merit, and reported it, their ratings would skyrocket. If anything, they would HOPE that this story would break (for the purposes of ratings and money. I doubt the anchors themselves would like a story like this to break because it is more akin to yellow journalism). The fact that this has been going on since January and hasn’t been reported by the “MSM” is especially telling, especially if even the most conservative of shows and publications don’t publish the stories. It’s simple: they don’t trust Larry, and they don’t see any merit in the story.

Moreover, reputable publications and cable broadcasters would not report on something that has been covered by the tabloids, such as Globe and National Enquirer. If you haven’t gotten the chance, read one of those magazine (not necessarily about Mr. Sinclair) and ask yourself, “Is this reputable news?”

They are, in the school of Communication Studies, known as “Soft News.” Soft news has many qualities about it: human interest, gossip, celebrity stories, and fantastical stories about bat boy and aliens.

So, who isn’t doing their research? Who isn’t informed? I would submit that Mr. Sinclair’s supporters are the zombies, asking the same old tired and ridiculous questions. In the grand scope of history there have always been scandals like this, and many of them have been the fantastical endeavors of people with an agenda.

I will state again:
I am not a lawyer. I have never made that claim, nor will I ever. I did not know that is “BHDC” site even existed.

Read the latest posts on Mr. Sinclair’s blog and tell me who is more educated and who is less “zombie-like.”