Fish, Dope, Gay, Fish, Fish
At a bookstore in Columbia, SC.
Fish, Dope, Gay, Fish, Fish
At a bookstore in Columbia, SC.
[Note – I’m am desperately going to try not to use the c-word. It’s warranted. It’s the precise word to use. But I’m going to try my best to stay away from it.]
Let me say upfront that I don’t hate conservatitves. When I argue with them, I do my best to be respectful and not pull a whole bunch of cheap rhetorical tricks. However, there’s a certain breed of conservatitive that has such a loose grip on the facts that consversation is completely impossible almost to the point where after two minutes they’re screaming that I’m a freedom hating faggot that wants to fuck their son and clone Stalin.
Think I’m kidding? I’m not. Take a look at this c…..er…conservative name Lynn Thomas who goes by the name of Cao (pronounce it however you want). Pick any post, it doesn’t really matter which. The latest, as of this writing, is titled “shouldn’t we be allowed to have an opinion?” Now, you’re thinking to yourself – what’s wrong with that? We live in America, a country based on the free exchange of ideas. It’s a right that many Americans lay down their lives for. Not just soldiers, but civil rights workers, protesters, clergy and everyday people. So the answer, obviously, is “yes, EVERYONE is allowed to an opinion.” Or are we? Cao continues –
And I think [thank?] God I still live in a country where we can agree to disagree and still remain friends.
That is – unless the people I’m disagreeing with – are marxist Obamanots. In that case, they’ll do their best to destroy people who disagree – because groupthink in their world, RULES, and you’re only allowed one opinion: theirs.
See what I mean? By disagreeing with Cao you are attempting to destroy her because…your opinon doesn’t count. Only hers does because it’s the correct opinon. Calls of “why can’t we all get along” from the right (and left, sometimes) never mean that. The paradox in the previous statement is stunning – “you are only allowed one opinion: theirs.” Soooo…how many opinons does she allow when to disagree with her makes you a “marxist Obamanot”? Answer – none.
These disingenuous pleas for “understanding” and “tolerance” fuel my hatred for extreme wingnuttery. They are not stable people. None of them. I’ve spoken with on the radio and 90% of their arguments whither in the face of very simple logic. Case in point (and forgive me for being sketchy on the details) – A couple of years ago in Georgia, a defendent grabbed the gun from a cop and shot his way out of a courtroom. Pretty embarassing, right? Of course – because the cop was a woman. If it had been a guy, the defendent would have been overpowered by the big, manly cop and order would have been quickly restored. I think it was Mike Gallagher that used that example to argue for a male-only police force. EXCEPT that a year or so later the exact thing happened with a male cop. I called him, got on the air and reminded him of his previous statement which he ignored and asked what size Birkenstock I wore. I’m serious. He wouldn’t even address the issue because he had no leg to stand on. If you’re going to call for the firing of all female cops due to a single incident then you should, in a morally pure world, call for the firing of all male cops for the same offense.
Wingnuts, though, don’t care about morality. They don’t care about anyone except the Wingnut Club. How does Rush Limbaugh condemn drug abusers only to turn around, admit he has a drug abuse problem and continue to be respected. He conciously bought drugs illegally. In a morally pure world, he should be crucified in the public square and held up to small children as a prime example of hypocrisy. Instead, he got a raise and higher ratings. Newt Gingrinch fucked around on his wife while condeming Bill Clinton for fucking around on his wife. Newt is held up, not as a pariah, but as a scion of the “Conservative Values”. Larry Craig? He’s a faggot so put him up againt the wall and pull the trigger. Wingnuts hate faggots because Jesus hates faggots.
BUT, if you’re a useful faggot and you behave yourself, then, you’re ok. Take David Brock, for example. Brock, before he started the liberal Media Matters, was a Republican attack dog. Remember Anita Hill and “a little bit nutty, a little bit slutty”? That was Brock. Pretty much everything in The Real Anita Hill was a lie, he later said.
I want to make sure that this is understood clearly – David Brock was paid to lie about Anita Hill so Clarence Thomas could get on the Supreme Court. The Republican Party knew about these lies. This, I add with a admirable understatement, was NOT a moral action.
Brock wasn’t an out-out gay man but everyone knew. Why, then, would the memebers of the party of family values, memebers of the party of God, the members of the party of “gay marriage will destroy America” pay David Brock$300,000/yr to write for the American Spectator? Aren’t gay people the enemy? Answer – they…don’t…care. The ends, as Stalin knew, justify the means.
Fun Fact – Ann Coulter fag hagged Brock! Isn’t that sweet?
Now, the wingnuts reading this will no doubt use the tried and true rhetorical flourish of “OH YEAH? BARNEY FRANK’S BOYFRIEND RAN A PROSTITUION RING OUT OF THEIR APARTMENT!!! HOW DARE YOU PREACH TO US ABOUT MORALS???” This has the effect of not answering the question. Rather, it’s hoped that by bringing up some Democratic scandal they somehow magically absolve themselves of their own. It doesn’t actually work that way but let me address it briefly
You can only hate something if you hate something
Most democrats don’t hate gay people nor do they find homosexuality immoral. Most democrats don’t hate drugs and don’t find drugs immoral. Most democrats don’t have that big of a problem with prostitution. So, the Barney Frank thing is no big deal…especially since he didn’t know it was going on AND reported it to the House Ethics committee when he found out. I know that wingnuts love oversimplification so let me help you out – democrats are, by wingnut standards, immoral and so explicitly embrace immorality, therefore to judge us by your strict moral codes is comapring apples to oranges.
But here’s the thing – we acknowledge your theoretical code of conduct where as you, in your best imitation of Christ, piss on ours. Lynn calls us, of all things, Marxist. Really? That’s odd, because in three out of the four gospels, Matthew, Mark and Luke, there is the almost identical story of Jesus (yeah, THAT Jesus) telling some rich guy, “If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me.” And, for special bonus points, what do you call the redistribution of wealth?
But it’s even better than that.
The only version of the Bible that most evangelicals recognize as the one that God wrote is the King James Bible. There’s a great book (soon to be a VH1 Special) about the making of the King James Bible called In the Beginning: The Story of the King James Bible and How It Changed a Nation, a Language, and a Culture. Turns out that at least a few pious folks murdered other pious folks to get this new version or the Word of God done. And, oh, yeah, there’s compelling evidence that King James was at least bi-sexual. Yes. That’s right. The book (or at least the most accepted version of the book) is the result of a sodomite. If you can deal with the Marxist Word of God (TM) being finance by a bi-sexual, what’s the big deal with a gay negro crackhead for President?
And so, wingnuts turn to self-deception to ferret away all these nasty questions that threaten the vicious and closed-minded world they fester in and stave off some truths they’d rather not face. If one-man/one-woman is so important, why isn’t their an eleventh commandment? Why did God let polygamy flourish without retribution? Isn’t interpreting “Thou Shalt Not Kill” as definitive proof of God’s stance on abortion akin to “activist judges interpreting the Constitution”? How do you justify the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of innocent in the Middle East when the same commandment holds true?
They’re towelheads and will not rest until Allah reigns supreme over every surface of the world. After all, didn’t Allah say, “He that sacrificeth unto any god, save unto the LORD only, he shall be utterly destroyed. ” Wait, that was the GOOD GOD insisting that he reign supreme over every surface of the world.
And, of course, when you gotta kill the women and children for the glory of Allah, you gotta kill the women and children for the glory of Allah
32 Then Sihon came out against us, he and all his people, to fight at Jahaz.
33 And the LORD our God delivered him before us; and we smote him, and his sons, and all his people.
34 And we took all his cities at that time, and utterly destroyed the men, and the women, and the little ones, of every city, we left none to remain:
See, you can’t bring these points up with wingnuts. They can’t talk about them. They refuse. Lynn and her Lynn-nots herself once tried to convince me that Jesus was actually very free-market economy. True! Jesus wasn’t into welfare, according to them and when, in the space of five minutes, I could get my search terms right to get the passages I quote above, they attacked me as ignorant about what Jesus actually said. The irony? If they actually knew, believed and followed the Bible they should have known those verses off the top of their heads. The four Gospels don’t tell the same stories so for three out of four to stress the rich casting off thier wealth to help the poor…that’s pretty significant.
Wingnuts cherry pick their morality and when to observe it. They don’t have a problem telling God to go screw when it suits their agenda to do so. “Pious Rich Christian”, according Jesus himself, is an oxymoron. John McCain had lobbyists working for dictatorships and the wingnuts shrugged. After all, you gotta make your money somehow, right? Obama goes to a party where there might have been drugs and it’s proof that he’s a drug addict. The bush family has close ties to Saudi Arabia where almost every terrorist involved in 9/11 came from and not one wingnut questions that relationship or demands to invade Saudi Arabia. Obama sits on a board with Bill Ayers, a founding member of the Weather Underground, and Obama is consorting with terrorists.
Lynn, I know this mean nothing to you. You probably can’t even wrap you’re mind around your own contradictions. I’m not an Obama supporter. I did give him $25 just to piss off Hillary, but chances are good that I will vote, not as my party, or my friends or God wants me to. I will vote my conscience because I have a conscience. You don’t, so you’ll vote for who you’re told to. And against every single teaching of the Jesus you profess to love you will tirelessly work to tear down by any means necessary those who disagree with you.
Jesus might have saved you from stoning. I wouldn’t. I’m not Jesus. And neither are you.
I’m contemplating blacking this blog out until Clinton withdraws. I know it wouldn’t mean anything but it would be a sign of my own contempt for a person who consistently shows America that four years of her presidency is Russian Roulette with three bullets in the chamber.
RFK’s assassination? At long last, have you no shame. (I’m sure that Olbermann had that in his first draft, btw)
Despite the spin on both of the campaigns, I believe she knew what she was doing. On many occassions, I, like probably 90% of Americans, said out loud or to themselves, “Obama could get assassinated”. Some “hard working white person” could snap and rather than pull out of this hell called the bush years, we’re plunged in more confusion and hatred. I do my best to stuff those thoughts down. It’s a nightmare scenario. For Clinton, though, it’s a dream and a good one because it’s the only possible way that she can legimately win the nomination. As of 4pm today, according to the News Hour Delegate Tracker, Obama need 56 votes to clinch the nomination. Clinton needs 246. Killing Obama is just about the only way to stop him and Clinton blind, power-hungry ego isn’t above praying to the God she recently became aquainted with in order to appease the Evangelicals.
Leaving aside her cynical moving of the goalposts to fool herself into thinking she’s got a chance (“John McCain came from behind, why not me?”) think about her responses to her multitude of mistakes – she never apologizes and she never backs down. It’s not really her fault that she repeated her lies about Bosnia. – she was sleep deprived and anyone could have made that kind of mistake. Now contrast that with bush’s Politco interview where he would apologize for the clusterfuck in Iraq because “some people told [him] there were weapons of mass destruction.” Has Clinton ever apologized for her role in advancing the Iraq war? No. She just blames bush who blames “people”. Notice any similarities?
When the phone rings at 3am do you really want someone so “sleep deprived” that they cannot understand how incredibly fucking stupid bringing up the RFK assassination was? Hillary’s not apologizing for it. No, no, she’s digging herself deeper by half-assing some feeble explanation without even acknowledging that she implicitly wished death on Obama whether she meant to or not.
You probably don’t remember the Rev. Wright issue. Oh. Wait. Hillary still beats that dead horse. Anyway – what was Obama’s reaction? Did he spout some kind of double-speak? Did he blame Michelle because he didn’t really want to go to that church anyway? No. At first, he stood up and defended his pastor and used his demi-bully pulpit to address the subject of racial divide in America and in it, apologized to those who were offended. Can you see Clinton apologizing for anything? I can’t. Clinton strikes me as closer to bush in temperment than McCain. I’ve already had 8 years of that. I don’t want more.
There’s a theory that Reagan wanted Gobachev to hear the “evil empire” comment. It was psy-ops. Clinton’s not stupid. I don’t believe that kind of thing just slips out. I believe that, with no June surprise on the horizon, no Obama “fucks puppies stories”, no “Michelle sacrifices Christian babies to Allah” stories, Clinton at last threw the kitchen sink – Someone’s going to kill Obama, the party will be even more fucked up than she made it and then you’ll be sorry you didn’t listen to her back in Iowa! All of this party strife was so easily avoided by sticking with the candidate that everyone said would be the nominee until Mr. Hopeful showed up with his patriarchal oppression and relying on race instead of substance to carry him through.
She meant to say it. If she’s putting out 3am scare ads and pictures of bin Laden – she meant to say it. Pure and simple.
Why hasn’t there been a concerted effort to kick her ass out of the race? Because she’s a girl. Every pundit I’ve seen talks about “letting Hillary down easy” like the girl you asked to the prom when your first choice managed to survive an assassination attempt. “Um, Hillary, I’ve…um…got some bad news…Emily’s going to pull through so…um… I can’t go with you. Can I have my ring back?” If Clinton wasn’t relying on gender, she wouldn’t make such a big deal of it. “The biggest and last glass ceiling”? Fuck you. I have never heard Obama make a speech about how proud Harriet Tubman would be of him personallly. Yes, he talks about race but he keeps it on a national level – AMERICA can accept a black president, any black president. He de-emphasizes his role. Clinton can only think about her role. It’s not that America can accept any woman as a president but that it accepts HER as the first woman president and isn’t she brave to chart these waters. She’s Sally Fields accepting an award for playing a candidate.
So if you didn’t mean to RFK statement the way it came out – fuck you for not issuing an immediate and heartfelt apology. I know you couldn’t anyway, because you’re not programmed for apology and Karl Rove has your heart.
If you did mean it – then fuck you for your cynicism in thinking America would vote for you because Obama would probably be killed soon.
I truly hope your political career has ended. You’ve worked so hard to destroy it.
“Quack quack – all of you cowards attack me anonymously – quack quack – and it’s JUST NOT FAIR – quack quack – all I’ve done is make damaging claims that I will never back up and DEMAND you believe them or I’ll publish your personal information on my weblie – quack quack – WHY ARE YOU ALL SO MEAN TO ME – quack quack”
That’s pretty much been papatard’s descant for…oh…five months. Of course, like Stalin, who lived in splendor while the peasants starved, believing him to be “one of the people” and like bush, who’s pretty much like Stalin in his insistence that you “do as I say, not as I do”, papatard DEMANDS to play by a different set of rules. Thus, he attempts to deflect any discussion of the actual issue by loading his shotgun with new lies and pulling the trigger. Now that I think about it, it’s oddly like Evangelicals who, when you ask for proof of the existence of God, smugly cross their arms and insist they won’t talk to you until you prove he doesn’t exist. (Note: If you want a good rebuttal to that one, check out Why Does God Hate Amputees.)
The new tactic is emailing the super-delegates. It’s a sign of both how desparate and stupid they are that they didn’t start with this step. But then HRC was a lock, right? 😉 Of course, the super-delegates don’t know papatard from shinola so they make the mistake of writing the larrytard who emailed them back. This then gets posted on papatard’s weblie in an attempt, I imagine, to “shame” them. Something along the lines of ‘HOW DARE YOU INSULT A MAN YOU’VE NEVER MET WHO’S SIMPLY TRYING TO GET THE WORD OUT THAT HE BLEW BARACK OBAMA WHILE OBAMA SMOKED CRACK!?? HE’S TELLING THE TRUTH! HE PROMISED HE WAS!”
Here’s the thing, though – when they post the emails, they include the super-delegate’s email address but not the address of the larrytard that sent it.
Huh? I thought this whole thing was supposed to be about owning up to your personal responsibility. Aren’t anonymous trolls the lowest scum imaginable? I guess not. Not when it comes to “protecting” larrytards. I’m guessing the rationale is that if he published a larrytard email address then Obama would put out a hit on that person…even though the address is probably from a fake gmail account. I mean, they’re innocent, right? It’s not like they’re a super-delegate attempting to destroy democracy by, as one larrytard put it so politely, “having the DC police forcibly dragging the president of the United States out of the White House for murder and drug dealing”. These super-delegates did nothing except their civic duty. As a result, I’ve no doubt their receiving some fairly derogatory emails condemning them for having an opinion not shared by papatard. What a lovely little fascist fuedal system he’s created. papatard uber alles. Is kristallnacht next? Will Deatheaters, their faces hidden, show up at the homes of pro-Obama super-delegates and throw rocks at their windows to support der Fuck-tard?
In reality, 90% of papatard’s support would dry up if there was even a hint that their identities could be ferreted out. Pun intended. In papatard’s America, only he would have signed the Declaration of Independence while the rest of the useless fucks celebrated unseen in the next room whispering about how brave they all were and how King George would never be able to identify them if went south. Victor, before he defected, wouldn’t fess up to who he is. A “screen name” is not a person. As the ubiquitous New Yorker cartoon says – “On the internet, no one knows you’re a dog”. I wonder what would happen to papatard’s support if his supporters email and home addresses started magically appearing? I bet they wouldn’t think it was as funny, somehow.
Me? I’d think it was hysterical.
So, if you’re a super-delegate or a victim of papatard who’s recieved any emails due to his a-morality and un-Americanism, feel free to leave the whole email in the comments or, if you’d rather, just the email address. And, on the off chance that some appear, please make sure to send a note or twelve to each little larrytard asking them how it feels to be outed without their consent. I’m sure they’ll thank you.
If you’re a poor, uneducated white person who doesn’t want to vote for “that kind of person” then HRC wants your vote. And if you’re planning on voting for HRC simply for that reason – if you’ll pledge to switch parties simply because “that kind of person” isn’t your kind of person then why not tell the rest of the country about it by using the ultimate American power tool – the bumper sticker
I mean, really, if you can go on national television and tell the country you’re a racist then buy a 50 pack and hand them out at church.
papatard is running a probably illegal lottery to raise money for a “press conference” in DC. B-b-b-but, WTF, says this little larrytard –
Wednesday, May 21, 2008 at 12:35 pm
I looked at the Nat’l Press Club Calander and didn’t see Larry listed. When will the press conference be??
And THAT, ladies and germs, is why they are called “larrytards”.
UPDATE – I feel compelled to add on to this a little for those who may not understand the concept of “press conference”. I don’t claim to be an expert by any stretch of the imagination so I could be spewing shit myself. However, I have gone to a couple of them.
A “press conference” can be held anywhere – the WH briefing room, a function room at a Hojos or even outside the crack house you may call home. The trick is to get the press there by sending out a press release. My favorite was a “press conference” held by Randall Terry, formerly of the hardcore anti-abortion outfit, Operation Rescue and currently of Operation Rescue 2.0. I subscribe to www.christiannewswire.com so I see a lot of what comes across.
A while ago, while Guiliani was still in the race, Terry sent out a press release telling everyone that he would be conducting a press conference at that Boston of the Republican National Committee to shame them into dropping Guiliani. Feeling that the RNC really wouldn’t host this kind of press conference, I sent an email to the head. He replied that this was the first he’d heard about it and thanked me for the heads-up.
The day of the press conference, I jumped in the car and drove downtown. I was about 15 minutes early so I circled around the the building that housed the RNC. I saw four men and a seven year old boy holding signs calling Guiliani “the devil” and “satan”. I passed one news van from the local Fox affiliate but no cameras could be seen. One of the things I learned is that, when going to one of these things, make sure you can visually identify who you’re going to see. It turned out that one of the men was Terry and that the boy belong to him. Mind you, I was fifteen minutes early.
I parked and asked the group where the RNC was. They pointed to the building and I walked in.
“Hi,” I said to the woman in the completely empty office, “I’m here for the Randall Terry press conference. She stared at me blankly. “Um,” I continued, “I saw a press release that Randall Terry would be holding a press conference here to denounce Rudy Guiliani’s candidacy for president.”
“Um,” she mirrored back, “he was here but there wasn’t a press conference. I think he’s downstairs holding a sign or something.”
And, that, was Randall Terry’s big press conference.
PS – Ok. Here’s the only footage of the “press conference” that I’m aware of
Yes, yes, I know that I wasn’t going to soil this thing with any more papatard excrement but, honestly – what a fucking sociopath.
The name Fred Fischer probably doesn’t mean anything to anyone. Honestly, I had to look it up. Fischer worked for Joseph Welch whose law firm represented the Army in the Army-McCarthy hearings that ultimately brought down Tail Gunner Joe (who, ironically, was also heavily medicated). McCarthy accused the Army of harboring commies and, not really finding any and getting a good ass-kicking, began to flail about. Is any of this sounding familiar? In what was meant to be a coup de grace, McCarthy accused Welch of harboring commies in his law firm – Fred Fischer.
Fischer was supposed to help Welch out during the hearings. However, after Fischer told Welch that he had belonged to the National Lawyers Guild, during, and a little while after, law school (a supposed commie front organization), Welch thought it prudent to bring someone else. McCarthy, to prove the full extent of his scumbaggery and despite an agreement not to bring Fischer up…brought Fischer up. That’s where the immortal “at long last, have you no shame” line comes from.
papatard never had any shame to begin with, so that line has no power over his a-morality. He’s now so scared and desparate that any remotely negative mention of him results in the inclusion of not only your name on his blog but now your full address. His latest victim knows only the bare bones of the story and played no part in the succesful debunking his central lie or any of the multitude of subplots that came to papatard in a morphine induced haze. Not only that, but like some kind of autistic child, once he fixates on you, he won’t let go – even if you posted a few comments on his web-lie and then threw up your hands in disgust. I’m not talking about me, I’m talking about my shoulder angel/devil Denise. Denise, too, did no debunking but simply and proper told papatard that he was full of shit. More? Ok. My friend, Derek Gerry, to the best of my knowledge, has never even visisted papatard’s web-lie and yet, simply because he knows me and we did a radio show together, papatard dragged him into his fever dream by posting a picture of Derek and I, labelling him as “Mr. Gerry”.
papatard’s whole raison d’etre (and Mitch gets NO credit for that phrase) is convincing the larrytards that he’s serious. Not that he’s RIGHT, mind you, but just that he’s serious. The only action he knows is attack. larrytards, like vampires, must have new blood. They’re easily bored since Jerry Springer only plays a few times a day. This means fresh meat. He knows that if he stops attacking, the larrytards might start asking for evidence of his original charge. Several already left the fold. I guess five months of “you vill beleef me or be banish-t” wore thin. You can’t spend that kind of time asking Obama to prove a negative without offering proof that it actually happened. Statements like this
In these documents and affidavits Mr. Levy makes statements he knows to be outright LIES and I believe Mr. Levy should back them up at once or face legal action
are bound to make even Lenny say, “Geooorge – how come he tell man to back up lies when he no back up lies himself? He sound like he mean to rabbits.”
From the start, I believe, this has had nothing to do with Obama. This has been about winding up the noise machine so the central issue gets lost. The most recent defector said what I predicted a while ago
I stood for you and I blogged for you but when I see that “baking” cookies and fighting other website is the only thing left here, then I must part too. Good luck. I will once and awhile see how you are doing and hope the best for you, son.
And that’s all it is. Bickering and lawsuits that make him and his “donators” money. It’s a ponzi scheme, pure and simple – give me $25 and I’ll magically turn it into $75…after I win my lawsuit. Could he really be bilking old folks? It’s audacious and retarded all at the same time.
papatard, I know you’re reading this so I’m going to let you in on a little secret. You’ve called me the boss of the Mitch gang. I’m not really. I did have my own plan, though. I might have told people about it but, honestly, I don’t remember. I’m probably not the only one that came up with it. But, I’m going to tell you because you’re in your death throes. Before I do, though, I want you to remember that you’ve almost always followed my advice. I’ve been more right than wrong. That said, I now give to you my master plan –
Keep you talking
Simple as that. You can’t shut up. The more you talk, the more you make mistakes. The more mistakes you make, the more fucked you get. At some point, and that point is rapidly approaching, your mistakes catch up to you and your poorly constructed house of cards comes a-tumbling down. Had you kept your mouth shut – had you stayed on topic – had you produced any substantial evidence you would, as my YouTube video said, be eating lobster and gobbling oxycontin with Rush Limbaugh and Obama would be politically dead instead of talking to an audience of 75,000. You, papatard, would have been personally responsible for insuring a black man would not be president for 100 years. You would have been in history books and, yes, maybe attained the martydom you crave at the hands of an assassin.
But you couldn’t shut up. You dug yourself deeper. And I don’t believe you actually blew Obama with or without drugs. There is no fat lady. There is no singing. There is only a chorus of larrytards in an echo chamber. Frankly, I’m not even sure it was about money. I think you’re just a sad, lonely man who got tired of being branded a loser.
That hasn’t changed nor will it.
Mean? Cruel? No.
Look at it this way – If Obama touted the fact that he was courting poor, uneducated black people the press would have a field day with it. If poor, uneducated black people went on TV and said they wouldn’t vote for Hillary because she was white, the MSM would bury him. Instead, they hold proudly racist Clinton supporters as a valid reason for giving Clinton the nomination.
Ask yourself this – as a Democrat, do you really want racists deciding who your nominee is? Are we really supposed to hold the poor and uneducated of any race as the pinnacle of of what America should stand for? As a Democrat, does it bother you in the least little bit that Clinton uses the endorsements of scumbags neo-cons like Karl Rove and Richard Melon Scaife as legitimate reasons for her candidcy?
Sweet Jesus, I hope not
Chris Matthews isn’t the most consistent of people. He’s happy to play lap dog just as much as attack dog. Personally, I’m somewhat surprised that Ann Coulter gave him his balls back.
And yet, when uber-asshole Kevin James starts in on talking points that he knows nothing about, Matthews allows him to prove to the nation that the three brain cells he has left have atrophied. Watch the clip first with the sound off. Like any sociopath worth his weight dead kittens, James never once backs off from his bullshit. He’s the same screaming asshole at the end that he was when the interview started.