Noooo…I’m not going to say it but he wanted a new post and since he’s one of the twelve people that read this (unless there’s some kind of Larry Sinclair bullshit posted) I feel obliged to comply.

But for the moment, I’ve got to finish off crafting a sparkling 45 minute set…so…later

The M&N Interview - The M&N Interview

Enjoy, kids!

(And to any larrytards lurking - can’t you fucking do your own work for once in your life?  I mean you came over here to grab the press conference audio press conference audio, too, a few weeks ago because we got that first, as well.)

Fucking kidney stones…should this shit be getting better.  Instead, it’s 3:30am and…well…I’m not going to go into it, but it sucks.

Having this time, though, here’s the first half of the Mitch And Nan Show on the Roger Fredinberg show.

Mitch And Nan Show

Thanks to Peter for recording it and splitting it up.  I put it back together.

I should write something witty and pithy about this but I’m listening to it right now.  All I can say is that Roger puts forth the larrytard agenda quite well - it’s doesn’t matter if it’s true, I hate Obama and I’ll believe it.  The weirdest thing is that Roger keeps saying - well, it can’t really be proven so…

Huh?

Um, yes it can.  papatard keeps saying he has evidence.  So, papatard says it can be proven.  Why would Roger say it can’t?

Maybe I’ll try to get back to bed

Dear sweet jesus.

We have come to a very weird place indeed when the larrytards now turn on the gods and goddesses who rule over the Hell called Fox News.  It goes to show just how far down the rabbit hole they’ve gone and what a undeserved sense of self they have to watch them DEMAND that a national news organization (and I use the term loosely) pay attention to the 56 odd defectives that post on papatard’s web-lie.

First, Wells DEMANDED that Sen. Joseph Biden come clean about his role in the conspiracy to “silence” papatard.  I’m not sure whether this pathetic plea for validity is an upgrade or downgrade from that.

TV news has hit a new low. A news reporter that I once respected, Greta Van Susteren, and a former news show, Fox News, have become major disappointments. Just a few weeks ago my lady and I were watching Greta on Fox and we both remarked at how much she had changed. Greta used to be a hard hitting, no nonsense news seeker. Now she hosts an entertainment show. Well, I have had it!

Greta recently posted the following:

“June 18th, 2008 11:00 AM Eastern
Here is why…
by Greta Van Susteren
Many of you email me asking why I don’t interview Larry Sinclair….here is why (click on the link)

click here…

I assume you now know why I have not interviewed him and no one has…his 27 year criminal record and all sorts of other matters mentioned in the above link tell you why..in short, no credibility.

I urge all of you to look to the issues…and not to the smears. While the internet is a great communication and educational tool, it is also viral when it comes to smearing people. There are good reasons to be skeptical of what politicians promise you.. challenge them about those promises…question their policies…but let’s skip unsubstantiated smears.”

The click here points to this site:

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11164.html

So, greta is basing her decision to not interview Sinclair based on rumors, smears and one biased blog?

HA!  Uh…yeah.  One biased blog?  Kinda like the way the larrytards cream over http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com which provides no back up for ANYTHING it says? You mean, that kind of biased blog?  It takes a certain specific type of craziness to form those thoughts in your mind and then type them out and publish them.  Just to be clear - there are other larrytard blogs but they mostly copy and paste from papatad’s blog and add something like “THIS THING’S GONNA BLOW ANY DAY NOW”.  Honestly, I haven’t looked that hard but NOBODY seems to be doing any kind of investigation into whether papatard is telling the truth.  Oh, sure, they’ll publish the names and addresses of those who dare to ask for the tiniest morsel of evidence and attempt to shred the reputations of the non-believiers but as to supporting documentation?  Nope.  Sorry.  Judge Judy is on and they can’t miss that.

Rumors and smears?  Again - where’s the proof?  It doesn’t exist.  Both The Mitch and Nan Show and Death By 1000 Paper Cuts have done solid reporting debunking pretty much everything papatard says.  The only thing the larrytards have done is repeat, zombie and cult-like, their fervent belief that papatard must be telling the truth because he’s a criminal.  papatard certianly hasn’t given any.

Even better, Wells continues

So, what is the reason Greta?

It goes to the heart of the matter that even though Greta gives the reason that she’s not reporting on it, Wells refuses to see it.  It’s as if he’s saying, “Until you admit that papatard is telling the truth, I will not trust anything you say.”

Are you drooling over Obama?

Are you more interested in doing an entertainment show?

Are you afraid of being tagged racist?

This is the classic papa/larrytard gambit - ask a bunch of stupid questions.  Why are you afraid?  What are you hiding?  Why won’t you answer these rhetorical questions?  In the larrytard world, not supporting papatard means you support Obama.  I’m not sure that Greta does, although I couldn’t really tell you.  It’s beside the point.  Not believing a career criminal means you hate America and you’re secretly afraid of black people.

Are you afraid to get your hands dirty and do some real work? Some real news reporting?

HEE HEE!  Sounds like she already did her reporting, you stupid fuck.  She dug around and found out that there’s not one shred of evidence to support papatard’s claims and a MOUNTAIN of evidence that shows that taking him at his word is a bad idea.  Seriously - how do you hold a press conference promising to bring forth evidence, NOT bring forth evidence and then still have followers left at the end of the day?  How?  You’re a con artist skilled at keeping the eyes of your marks as far away from the truth as possible.  Almost three weeks after the airlines sent his bags to France (um…no…they didn’t) he still has not produced the evidence that luggage theoretically contained.  Even more shocking - not one larrytard has asked for it.  Do some reporting on THAT, Wells.  Find out where the luggage is and what it contained.  Then you can start bitching about Greta’s lack of reporting.

Greta, and most of the rest of MSM, I and other bloggers and truth seekers have been doing your job. I actually speak to Larry Sinclair. I ask questions without assuming. I do not drink the “kool aid”. In fact, I have researched and written about Dan Shomon, Obama’s former campaign manager and co schemer in getting state grants for Robert Blackwell companies. You see, Greta, the Sinclair story did not happen in a vacuum. If you had been doing your job, you would have been aware of all the crime, curruption and drug connections that make Sinclair’s story more believeable.

OOH!  Wow!  You mean papatard tells you what to say, you believe him unconditionally and call that “reporting”?  Wells, you may ask questions without assuming but I think they sound something like this

Wells: Larry, did you blow Obama while he smoked crack?
papatard:  Yes.  I did.
Wells:  Really?
papatard:  Yes.  Really.
Wells:  Well.  It doesn’t get more definitive than THAT!
papatard:  I’m a truth teller.  That’ll be $200 for the interview.
Wells:  Best money I ever spent!

What do Blackwell and Rezko have to do with papatard?  Nothing.  Nothing at all.  It’s more smoke and fuel to stoke the fires of Obama-hatred.  But if you collect enough untruths and tie them up with a pretty ignorance-colored ribbon then it doesn’t matter what bullshit scandal you’re talking about - it’s all one great big fake scandal and the specifics don’t matter.  You’ve judged him guilty of one so he’s guilty of everything.  Kinda like the way the Republican primaries work.

And guess what, one of the bloggers that has tried the hardest to discredit Larry Sinclair and anyone else seeking the truth about Obama, has been found out. This person has a recent criminal record. The is the same blogger that lied and took credit for Larry’s arrest. If you had bothered to check, the blogger’s information was incorrect. If you go to my blog, you will find the facts.

HEH!  Even if this is true (and as I recall, it was a conflict with a client, not a “criminal” matter) you’ve shot yourself in foot AGAIN proving what a raging hypocrite you are.  The whole “I believe papatard” movement rests on a single notion - just because he’s a career criminal doesn’t mean he’s not telling the truth.   (Yeah.  I know.  That’s why they’re called larrytards.)  By Wells’ own logic, there is no good reason NOT to believe “one of the bloggers”.  (You’ll note that Wells is too chickenshit to even name said blogger).  If being a “criminal” does not discount papatard from being truthful then why would Wells insist that “one of the bloggers” must be lying because he’s a “criminal”?

I have studied Barack Obama and Larry Sinclair and I can assure you that Mr. Sinclair has more credibility with me.

Soooo…let’s go over this again.  A career criminal with a history of fraud, drug running, human traficking and who has two outstanding warrants, one from late 2007,  has more credibility than a US senator that worked his way up from poverty to become a presidential candidate.

HOW does that work again?

So Greta. I challenge you to do some real reporting.

I also challenge you to contact me. I have facts as the result of hard work that I can provide. That is, if you care.

I love these challenges!  Especially since they only work one way.  On 7/25, I offered my own challenge to Wells.  He has never responded to it, which means he is guilty of raping puppies and feeding them to weavils.  In my opinion, that’s worse than being a career criminal OR a presidential candidate.  Currently, I have a challenge “awaiting moderation” challenging Wells to prove that papatard is telling the truth.

He won’t respond to either, I’m sure.  Why?  Because the first charge 1) is so spurious and unbelievable that to acknowledge it would do more harm than good and 2) he doesn’t give a fuck who I am.  Which is the precise reason that neither Obama, Biden or Greta will acknowledge him or any larrytard.  It’s pointless.

As to the second charge, you’d think that he’d want to clear that up.  Not so much.  He wouldn’t know the truth if it blew him.

What does insanity sound like?  Emphasis added.

1. Cao Says:
   June 26th, 2008 at 6:03 am My blog is not a street corner.

   You are a nuisance and making idiotic points while thinking my comments section is your soapbox.

   I don’t have time for it, and it is I who makes the rules here - just like I make the rules for who is a guest in my own house.

   If a dog craps on the carpet, you put him outside. So don’t let the door hitcha where the good lord splitcha.

   I have never said that the purpose of my blog is to debate moonbats.

   Liberalism IS a mental disorder - several psychiatrists have said so, and in fact, there are a couple of books on the subject.

   Did Obama kill anybody? Ask the Chicago PD about what’s up with their investigation, or Don Young’s family, or stop and ponder for a moment the fact that there’s only $1,000 reward for information on the killer…while Reverend Wright’s $1 million + mansion for his retirement is being paid for by TUCC.

   As I’ve said - the Dixie Chicks comparison is really dumb. If leftists are entitled to ‘buy blue’, then the other side is entitled to boycot for political reasons, too. The Dixie Chicks are not politicians - they should just shut up and sing.

   I’ve provided ample explanation and if you can’t accept it - that just proves your totalitarian ideology - that says you’re entitled to order people around.

   You’re not. Debate as you define it - is about insulting people you don’t agree with - and demanding them to print your comments so they shut up to listen to YOU and provide you a soapbox. Get your own radio show or blog if that’s what you’re looking for; that isn’t the purpose of CB.

Citizen Wells, who at this writing has not repsonded to my questions and is, by his logic, gulity, understands the age old axiom - If you can’t win the debate, attack.  At the heart of this is a follow up question that I asked, still “in moderation”, about an overview he wrote of papatard’s arrest.  He went over the “facts” of the Sinclair allegations but conveniently left out the murder charge.  He responded (and believe me, I was more shocked than anyone)

Paul.
It was an overview with events leading up to the arrest. I did not want to regurgitate all the facts and details. There is plenty of coverage of that. That post was about clarifying the events surrounding the arrest and exposing lies and hypocrisy.

I then asked

Oh. Ok. Because

2. Larry Sinclair contacted the Obama Campaign and David Axelrod in 2007. After multiple attempts, Sinclair got no response.

But he said Donald Young contacted him in 9/07 and identified himself as working for Obama. Just seems kind of odd, is all.

That question is still in moderation.  So, because I’m all about the futile, I left another comment

as well as the usual racist, anti-Muslim and, ironically, anti-gay crap they usually post.

Again, it’s quite possible that I missed the part in the Bible where Jesus called Pontius Pilates a nigger faggot but my understanding is that he didn’t and, more importantly, would condemn those who did.

I went through Presbyterian confirmation school and declined their offer to join at the end.  So when Wells asks me if I have any concept of Christianity, yeah, I do.  I know what I was taught and I saw how it was actually practiced.  The dichotomy shocked me.  In this aspect, you can make the comparison of Christianity to Communism - good theories but the implementations bear no resemblance to the original.  For a so-called devoted Christian like Cow to claim that Jesus would have nothing to do with welfare mothers (the majority of which, oddly, consist of white women and not a few wives of the troops she supposedly supports) is flat out wrong.  For Vic Eliason of VCY America to claim that there is a physical copy of the Homosexual Agenda is flat out wrong.

It can’t be stated too often or too strongly - Jesus does not support the perpetuating of lies. Wells and some of the inner circle claim that they have seen evidence that papatard is telling the truth and that it will be “released at the proper time”.  Those are code words for “bullshit”.  Let’s, for the moment, take them at their word - that means they are hiding the truth from the American public and, in the case of the erroneous murder charge, law enforcement.

To sum up - if they’re straight out lying, they’re scumbags and if they’re hiding the truth they’re scumbags.  What would Jesus do?

In the Christian paradigm, lying buys you a ticket to Hell.   That’s ANY kind of lying, including lying to push forward your twisted version of Christianity.  If you need to lie to get people to believe in Jesus then what kind of faith do you have?

Ok.  It should be known that I do a lot of trolling meaning that I like stirring shit up.  There are a lot of ways to do it but the easiest way is through comments on the target’s blog.  The hardest is an out and out troll blog and, yes, I have a couple of them.  One of which got linked to as an authoritative source for information on papatard.  THAT was a score of epic proportions and thank you sooo much to the anonymous asshole in Chicago that linked to it.

You’d think that trolls should be able to spot other trolls at the drop of a hat.  It’s not so.  At heart, most trolls do it to advance their political and/or social agenda.  Unless their just psychopaths.  Thus, I’ve fallen for troll sites hook line and sinker.  One of the “whitey” videos I found particularly horrendous, turned out to be a joke.  I wrote back to the guy and congratulated him.  It’s only right.

Thus, as you wend your way through tardville (which encompasses the larrytad sites as well as papatard’s web-lie) you start to ask yourself, could all of this be one big elablorate joke?  Could this be the prank of all pranks?  Can people actually be this blindly stupid to believe this textbook case of the ultimate loser?  And just when you’ve convinced yourself that it’s a joke, you remind yourself that almost nobody can fake a prison record or an arrest warrant and the next thing you know your curled up under the covers in your bed in fetal position, rocking slowly back and forth, wondering if America can survive until at least your great-grandkids are dead.

But just in the depths of your despair, the universe gives you another gift that makes the whole thing absolutely fucking hysterical, so THANK YOU, CITIZEN WELLS!

A brief recap - papatard had his press conference at the end of which he was arrested on an outstanding warrant in Delaware.  He spent a couple of days in…well…let’s call it a hotel that the larrytards didn’t have to pay for.  Apparetnly, the…um…hotel staff didn’t get the message that papatard is in constant chronic pain and frequently can feel certain parts of his body, whatever sounds most pathetic in the moment.  (papatard, as you remember, can’t eat because of an ulcer and, instead, claims he drinks 36 pepsis a day “to keep his weight up”.)

Anywho, he finally got sprung and I’m too lazy to find out how much it set the larrytards back if, in fact, they had to pay for it.  He’s currently stay with “a host” who I pray to GOD has a Sam’s club membership because 36 Pepsis a day runs into a nice chunk of change and papatard’s broke because his Social Security benefits got cut off for BEING A FUCKING CRIMINAL.  Ooops.  Sorry about that.

To continue - we all know that the entire world is against papatard’s valiant struggle to someday present the evidence that he blew Obama while blah blah blah.  HOWEVER - Citizen Wells recently discovered the chink in the armor of papatard’s persecutors - SEN. JOSEPH BIDEN!  You heard that right.  Biden is the key to the whole thing because Biden’s SON is the Attorney General of Delaware and TWO DAYS before papatard’s press conference, guess who submitted legislation to “encourage States to enter new and outstanding felony warrants into the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database”?

SEN. JOSEPH BIDEN!!

Game!  Set!  Match!

Oh.

Wait.

That’s really stupid.

Why the FUCK would a US Senator 1) even know about papatard and 2) care enough about him to push forward a bill that would have no effect on papatard’s press conference?  He introduced the bill.  No one voted on it.  Is Citizen Wells suggesting that the federal government tried to push through legislation in two days simply to arrest some three-time loser after his press conference?

Why, yes, he is!

Is that not one of the funniest things you’ve ever seen in your whole life?

Why, yes, it is!

Seriously, I’m glad that no one was home when I read Well’s blog.  I’m surprised the neighbors didn’t call the cops.

OH SHIT!  I almost forgot the punchline!  Not content with acting like a papatard wannabe, accusing Senators of malfeasance, Wells ends this post with what could be called “The papatard Credo”

Senator Biden, are you, your son, the Attorney General Of Delaware, or any member of your staff, responsible for any of these attacks and smears on Larry Sinclair?

Senator Biden Or Attorney General Biden,  I suggest that you
investigate what has happened to Larry Sinclair and respond on
this blog or with a public statement. No response will be
considered an admission of guilt.

a-HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!  “No response will be considered an admission of guilt”!

Ok - how’s this then

Citizen Wells - Is it true that you rape puppies and then feed them to weevils?  Is it true that you are nothing but an opportunistic hack with absolutely no sense of morality whatsoever?  Is it true that you actively ignore the blatant lies that papatard has told in order to boost your own pathetic sense of self?

No response will be considered an admission of guilt!!!

Kisses!

UPDATE 7pm - Wells has not yet responded.  He is guilty.

UPDATE 7:30pm - Wells has not yet responded.  He is guiltier than he was a half hour ago.

UPDATE 2:00am - Wells has not yet responded.  I have been hoping that he would because I like to think the best of people.  But he looks more and more guilty.  My stomach is tied up in knots over this.

UPDATE 8:30am - Wells has not yet responded. You really have to ask yourself - why wouldn’t he clear his name?

I can’t tell you how happy it makes me to type that.  Really.  Excuse me while I do a little victory dance again

.

.

.

.

Thanks.  Sorry about that.  But papatard is in jail and I’m thrilled.

Now, before you jump to any conclusions, he’s not in jail because of the Obama bullshit.  His incarceration is hopefully the beginning of the karmic comeuppance due to him.  It’s known that it’s for an outstanding warrant, probably from Delaware, although there’s still a Colorado warrant outstanding, as well.

What’s lovely is that he was arrested shortly after the press conference ended.  And I mean, shortly.  From the way I understand it, he left the build and, according to “moma”, was arrested by two “U.S. Marshalls”.  This means that barely had the notion of how badly the press conference went sunk into his Augustus Gloop head when John Q. Law swooped in and slapped the cuffs around his bologna-sized wrists.  I don’t care who you are - that’s some kinda harsh.  Not as harsh as what I’d hope for, though

Cops - Are you Lawrence Wayne Sinclair?
Papatard - I’m doing a press conference.
Cops - I asked you if you Lawrence Wayne Sinclair?
Papatard - Yes.
Cops - You’re under arrest.  Please come with us.
Papatard - SECURITY!  THROW THESE COPS OUT OF MY PRESS CONFERENCE!!
Cops – Jesus, you really are retarded, aren’t you.
Sibley – Now see here, you can’t just arrest my client on an outstanding warrant!
Cops – You’re Sibely?
Sibley – Montgomery Blair Sibley Esq!  Yes!
Cops – Nice kilt, asshole.  You’re under arrest, too for contempt of court.  Your license to practice lwa is suspended.
Manning – I HATE WHITEY MORE THAN JEREMIAH WRIGHT BUT NOBODY’LL PAY ATTENTION TO ME!!
Cops – Shut the fuck up. (to audience)  Press conference is over, folks.  Move along.

He was simply whisked away like…well, a common criminal.  No champagne.  No after party.  No all night orgy paid for with somebody else’s money.  Just a hopefully dank and depressing jail cell where papatard can have a horrible night’s sleep while he prays that, despite the definate possibility of flight risk, they’ll let him out on bail…paid for by somebody else’s money.

I haven’t had the chance to listen to the whole press conference yet.  I’ve been too busy tooling around in the Rolls Royce Drophead Coupe with the trunk stuffed to the bursting point with non-sequential hundred dollar bills that Axelrod personally dropped off at my house after the arrest. (He begged me to go on roadtrip to Montreal and I told him to give me the keys and then to go fuck himself…which he did).  I did, however, get to watch an excerpt of the video on YouTube and what I saw made me giggle.

What?  Me guilty?

Now, the kind among you might say that one screenshot doesn’t mean anything, so go ahead and watch the video.  Let’s check in with someone who was there - Seth Colter Walls from the Huffington Post

It is not often that a political reporter can claim to have witnessed the single most stupefying event on any single day, what with the diversity of inanity on display from coast to coast in an election year. But today, I feel confident laying claim to that dubious distinction, for I attended Larry Sinclair’s Wednesday press conference at the National Press Club.

Low praise, indeed.  Throughout the video, papatard seems ill at ease and combative.  He’d say that it’s because of the spinal damage he incurred that left him on permanent disability makes it difficult for him to stand.  But why did he stand, then?  Take away the podium and sit at the table!  Hell, FDR did it, right?  No, no.  Not papatard.  He wants the podium, the pulpit.  He wants to preach just like his hero, crazy fucked up Pastor Manning.  See, that’s what they do on the television.  They stand behind a podium.  So, in the David Lynch movie that plays without irony in his head, he stands.  Is it going too far to ponder if he had a hard-on during the entire thing?  We conjecture - you decide.

I’m sure there will be more PC talk later, but the money shot of the video (kudos to CNN!) comes around 6:50 when in a brilliant moment of actual truth telling, papatard says, (in response to the classic, “you’ve been a scumbag for most of your life, why should we believe” you question)

Well, to be honest with you, it’s not so much as to whether you believe me or not, as much as you hear me.

And that’s papatard in a nutshell.  It contains every single thing you need to know about this twisted, fucked up ex-con.  He doesn’t care about what anybody thinks.  He doesn’t care that people laugh at him and heap ridicule on him.  He only cares that you acknowledge his existance.  That he is alive.  And he doesn’t care what he has to do to make that happen.  He’ll lie, cheat, steal, bilk - it doesn’t matter.  It’s like he never stopped listening to Tommy: The Who.  I once wrote a sketch about some loser child who is so desparate for attention that he claims to be autistic - “HEY!  LOOK AT ME!  I’M AUTISTIC!  CAN’T YOU HEAR ME??  I’M TALKING TO YOU!”  Little did I know I was writing about papatard

papatard LOVES to talk about personal responsibility and how he (*cough* *hack* *wheeze*) has ALWAYS accepted it.  He talks about walking into a police station and turning himself in.  But it wasn’t, I believe, that he was accepting responsibility - he was making an enterance.  He talks about it as if he were some God of Morality showing the commoners how it’s done.  But, like most things, he downplays the fact that he first committed a fucking crime.  You don’t turn yourself into the cops for no reason.  You don’t get brownie points for doing the cops’ job for them.  Wanna take responsibility?  Don’t be a fucking criminal. Free advice, I know, but pretty good advice.

If he wasn’t an attention whore, then how could he, in good conscience, spend thousands of dollars of other people’s money and say…jack shit.  I’ve skimmed (not perused) through the press statement and it says nothing that hasn’t been said anywhere else.  More importantly, there is no evidence brought forward, no relevations made, no nothing.  It ends, as did his first abortive lwa suit against, of all things, the DNC to make them stop harrassing him, by insisting that Obama address the lies that papatard tells.  It’s truly an alternate universe he lives in where the accuser simply accuses and then goes home, because, I guess, that’s what accusers do - accuse.  He literally misses a major part of the concept of justice.  Perhaps it’s because all his life people have accused him and he’s been innocent every single time but just not able to disprove it.  Hence the accusations against him puts him away for another bid in the pokey simply because he could not prove them false.  So now it’s his turn to make an accusation and gloat about how Obama can’t disprove it.

Anywho -

His arrest changes absolutely nothing.  Literally.  We are where we were this morning only with papatard in jail.  The larrytards still support him, of course, and support him with more fervor.  Their leader has been wronged!  How dare he be called to question for some silly little crime he committed?  How DARE Mitch and Nan meddle in things that have no concern to them??  How DARE they try to get a criminal off the street??

No, papatard is a emotional fiscal vampire who will continue to suck money and souls out of the larrytards and, when they complain, cut them off brutally.  He’s already done it a couple of times.  papatard has created a cult - a true, unwavering cult - that lives and breathes only for the sweaty, sausage fingered touch of papatard.  As stated before, his suspended lawyer, Sibley, said that Jesus was persecuted, too.  And moma - my god - if you have any doubt as to why papatard is as fucked up as he is - taken a gander at this

I am so proud of him. The cesspool [The Mitch and Nan Show] can giggle all they want but they can never be as good a citizen as he is. Mistakes & all.

Proud?  Forgive me the judgment, but the day that I’m proud of my kid for being a career criminal that ran drugs, trafficked in humans, defrauded companies and people and tried to bring down a presidential candidate with a poorly constructed fairy tale, please take me out to the desert, tie me down and leave me to die slowly so I can think about how badly I failed as a parent.

Still, you celebrate the victories you have.

Stop by http://themitchandnanshow.wordpress.com and thank the crew for their hard work

Today is the day, kids!  papatard rented…well, let me be a little more precise about - the larrytards rented a room at the National Press Club for papatard to…um…do something.  Ostensibly, he’s supposed to put a nail in the coffin of Barack Obama, showing undeniable proof of his fairy-tale date with Obama in 1999.  What’s really going to happen?  Who knows?  papatard kept hinting that there would be a special guest and the larrytards went nuts - will he produce the driver that saw him blow Obama?  Will he?  Well, no.

It looks like it’s just crazy-assed Pastor Manning who makes Farrakhan look moderate.  I really don’t know what a “mac daddy” is but apparently Manning believes that Obama is one.  And, today Manning said, “his mamma was a trashy woman.  At 17 she tried to get as many men on her as she could”.  But that’s ok, Jesus really liked whores.  So, I guess that’s high praise from Manning.

(Speaking of Jesus, apparently we have all misjudged papatard horribly if you believe his friend (since he’s suspended for practicing lwa), Montgomery Blair Sibley.  To wit -

# Moma Says:
Wednesday, June 18, 2008 at 12:38 pm

I just spoke with Larry & Mr. Sibley. All is well & they are very upbeat. Mr. Sibley reminded me that they trashed Jesus also.

Yes.  The comparisons are endless, right down to the drug use, blow jobs and prison sentences.)

As stated earlier, I really wish I could say this is make or break time but it’s probably not.  larrytards, like stalkers,evangelicals and autisitcs, pick one thing and stick with it.  No matter how many restraining orders are taken out on them, no matter how many theiving, gay pastors they run through, no matter how many times they stick the fork in the electrical outlet, they will continue to do so because it is all they know.  And they will insist that it is the right thing to do.

And yet, Manning might not be the only surprise guest that shows up.  I’m sure there are plenty of people that wouldn’t mind sitting in an jamming with papatard.

I want to give a brief opposite-shoutout to xjblib over at www.bigheaddc.com.  Times are tough for him.  He’s banged papatard’s…um…drum since almost the very beginning.  He’s having a hard time understanding that you can’t claim that the Obama campaign refused to contact you and then claim you were contacted by the Obama campaign.  That’s what called amongst us sentient bi-peds as (put nicely) a contradiction.  Others call it a lie.  Still, in the face of a lie, xjblib still insists that “the truth will come out.”  The only reason I can come up with for this is that he believes he’s in that Star Trek episode with the hot, big breasted robots and he’s Mr. Spock.  Either way, he’s delusional.

More as information trickles out.

Happy (De)Press(ed) Conference, papatard!  At least you’ll get some new clothes out of it!


MUTO a wall-painted animation by BLU from blu on Vimeo